|
НАУЧНАЯ БИБЛИОТЕКА - РЕФЕРАТЫ - Nuclear Radiation
Nuclear Radiation
Nuclear Radiation
Viktor
Chernobay
Biology 115
Nuclear energy was discovered in the process of creating the atomic bomb.
After scientists conducted more experiments, they found that nuclear power was
a clean and efficient way to produce energy. “The first nuclear reactor was
created on December 2, 1942, at the University of Chicago by Enrico Fermi.”
(Editors of Scientific America, 1995). The discovery of nuclear energy
provided a new source of energy and an alternative to the use of natural
resources: such as coal, oil, water, and wood. At the same time, nuclear
energy could be used in a destructive way, such as the atomic bomb.
At that time, the discovery of a new source of energy was a very significant
event. By using a small amount of plutonium and uranium, two radioactive
elements, an enormous amount of energy could be obtained. Nuclear energy can
be produced in two different ways, by the fission or fusion process. Fission
involves the breaking up of heavier atoms into lighter atoms. In a nuclear
fission reaction, two smaller nuclei of approximately equal mass are formed
from the splitting of a large nucleus. This splitting of an atom produces a
large amount of energy. This process is the most common form of nuclear
power. Fusion is a method that combines lighter atoms into heavier atoms. In
a nuclear fusion reaction, a large nucleus is formed from two small nuclei joined
together. Fusion reactions are difficult to produce because of the repulsion
of the atom’s negatively charged electron clouds and the positively charged
nucleus. (LeMay, Beall, Robblee, Brower, 1996). Fusion is mostly used to
create the hydrogen bomb. (The World Book Encyclopedia, 1990). The byproduct
of nuclear energy is radiation. Radiation is created from the particles
(strontium-90, cesium-137, radon-222, krypton-85, and nitrogen-16) that are
given off as a result of the splitting of atoms. (Gale Encyclopedia of
Science, 1996) (Demmin, 1994).
As time went on, the attitudes of people towards nuclear energy changed. There
were many positive and negative aspects for the use of nuclear power.
Recently, people worldwide have started questioning the continued use of
nuclear power. Due to the deaths resulting from the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear
reactor accident, as well as the adverse effect the aftermath of the accident
had on the environment, there has been a public outcry concerning the safety of
society. As with many controversial issues, this topic has been widely debated,
but a solution has not been determined.
The positive aspects of the use of nuclear energy are that the supply of
natural resources does not have to be depleted, and also it is clean. It takes
a great amount of natural resources to create a small amount of energy. On the
other hand, a very small amount of plutonium and uranium is necessary for the
creation of a large amount of nuclear energy. This is important since there
are relatively small amounts of plutonium and uranium in the earth’s crust.
Compared to the production of power using coal, the creation of power generated
by nuclear energy does not pollute the air. As coal burns, there are poisonous
fumes that could cause sickness, if the area is not properly ventilated. As
the cost of electricity rose, the government was forced to look for an
alternative source of energy, which they discovered in nuclear reactors.
One of the major disadvantages of a reactor is the disposal of the nuclear
waste which harms the environment. “There are 434 nuclear reactors in the
world and 110 of them are in the United States.” (Wasserman, 1996) Not a
single one is functioning without polluting the environment. Attempts to store
nuclear wastes have not been very successful. One such attempt is to bury the
nuclear waste underground, but the leakage of nuclear waste has poisoned the
groundwater. Another attempt is to put the nuclear waste into deep ocean
water. Later, this was rejected by the public and also, in violation of an
international treaty because of the possibility of harming the ocean. Another
problem to the environment is the leakage of radioactive waste from space.
This problem is not pollution to the earth’s environment, but pollution of
space. There is no way to dispose of the nuclear waste in space.
The most significant drawback on this controversial issue is the threat of a
disaster. The two most serious situations were the accident at Chernobyl and
the explosion of the hydrogen bomb on Hiroshima. The first time that people
discovered the dangers of nuclear power was when the atomic bomb was dropped,
August 6, 1945, on Hiroshima. The effects of the bomb was that it destroyed
4.7 square miles of the city. Approximately 70,000 people were killed and
about another 70,0000 people were injured. Many people died later as a result
of nuclear radiation and radiation sickness. (The World Book Encyclopedia,
1990). The most serious nuclear disaster was the Chernobyl accident that
occurred April 26, 1986 in the Soviet Union. (Medvedev, pp.83-89.). An
accurate number of deaths as a result of this accident is very hard to
determine due to the secrecy of the U.S.S.R. surrounding this accident.
(Marples, 1996). A study done by a team of scientists from both the United
States and Japan has shown that there has not been any evidence found of
genetic mutation, which are changes in heredity, in the children of the
survivors of the bombing of Hiroshima. (Science News, 1996).
Following the Chernobyl accident, Soviet scientists suggest that there is
evidence that radiation has exhibited genetic mutation in the parents who were
exposed to radiation. According to them, the mutation was found in sperm and
egg cells, which contain the genetic building blocks of future generations. The
child’s DNA is a combination from both parents’ genetic makeup. When there is
any sequence that the child has, but that sequence was not found in either
parent, then this is called germline mutation. Ten years after the accident
that occurred at Chernobyl, evidence of mutation, in the exposed areas of the
country, indicates that radiation changed genetic makeup and that this has
passed onto future generations. (Science News, 1996). Also, there has been an
explosive increase in childhood thyroid cancer in Belarus, Ukraine and the
Russian Federation since 1986. This cancer is present in brothers and sisters
of the same family, which indicates that the cancer is a result of the accident
at Chernobyl. (Balter, 1995).
Whether the atom is used for peace or for war, man must contend with the
hazards of nuclear radiation. This radiation may cause burns, diseases, and
death. It may harm future generations by causing mutations.
In peacetime, the escape of radioactive particles from nuclear plants is the
main radiation hazard. More nuclear power plants will be built if a
significant amount of the world’s power is to come from uranium. As a result
of these plants, huge amounts of radioactive material will be produced. The
power plants must take necessary precautions to insure the communities are safe
from the radiation that may escape.
In wartime, the most serious danger from radiation is near or below the place
where the atomic bomb has exploded. If people are not killed by the bomb, then
they have to deal with the radioactive fallout. Even at a distance from the
blast, the injury can be serious.
The use of radiation has many positive attributes, but at the same time, the
significance of the drawbacks are overwhelming. No government nor scientist
can guarantee the safety of nuclear plants. Without this guarantee, there is
an immediate concern for the welfare of the world. I believe countries around
the world should begin a gradual process of shutting down nuclear plants and
begin making a much greater effort to develop widespread use of other sources
of energy, such as wind and solar power.
In the last decade, public concern for the use of nuclear energy has increased
dramatically. Few can debate that nuclear energy is clean, and can be produced
without using hardly any natural resources. Likewise, few can debate that
radiation is harmful to the environment, unsafe, and a great danger for all
living things. Scientists and mankind have to weigh the positive as well as
the negative aspects of nuclear radiation, and then decide what source of
energy the future holds that will benefit not only all living things, but also
the environment.
REFERENCES
Balter, Michael. (
1995). “Chernobyl’s Thyroid Cancer Toll.” Science. vol. 270, no. 5243,
pp. 1758-1759.
Demmin, Peter E. (1994).
Reviewing Chemistry. Amsco School Publications, Inc. New York. P. 85.
LeMay, Eugene H. Jr.,
Beall, Herbert, Robblee, Karen M., and Brower, Douglas C. (1996). Chemistry
Connections to Our Changing World. Prentice Hall. New Jersey. Pp. 792-798.
Marples, David R.
(1996). “The Decade of Despair.” The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientist.
vol.52, no.3, pp.22-31.
Medvedev, Grigori.
(1991). The Truth About Chernobyl. Basic Books. A Division of Harper
Collins Publishers. pp. 83-89.
Science News. (1996). “Radiation
Damages Chernobyl Children.” editors of Science News. vol. 149, no. 17,
p. 260.
Scientific American. (1995). “Disposing of
Nuclear Waste.” Editors of Scientific American. p. 177.
The Gale Encyclopedia of
Science.
(1996). Bridget Travers, editor. New York. vol. 5, pp. 3008-3009.
The World Book
Encyclopedia.
(1990). Field Enterprises Educational Corporation. Chicago. vol. 9 p. 230. and
vol. 1 p. 832.
| |