НАУЧНАЯ БИБЛИОТЕКА - РЕФЕРАТЫ - Impact of Evolution on Human Thought Evolution
Impact of Evolution on Human Thought Evolution
Farid
Gazizov
Impact
of Evolution on Human Thought
Evolution
Evolution by
definition of Webster dictionary is a gradual development of simple matters
into more complex. When most of the people hear “evolution” it associates with
development or history of the earth. History of the earth compiles of
gazillions of steps. The very first step in our history is a birth of the
earth, which took place over 4 billion years ago.
“Powerful
telescopes reveal new stars coalescing from galactic dust, just as our sun did
more than 4.5 billion years ago. The earth itself formed shortly thereafter,
when rock, dust, and gas circling the sun condensed into the planets of our
solar system. Fossils of primitive microorganisms show that life had emerged
on earth by about 3.8 billion years ago (Teaching about evolution and the
Natural of Science, ch. 1).”
Many
people throughout the centuries have been trying to find explanations to the
questions like: Why are surrounding us things the way they are?; why some type
of animals resemble another one? It was hard to answer these questions without
proper tools, experience and background knowledge. Even nowadays, not all
questions are answered. Darwin was the first human who succeeded in responding
to these questions. He was the first one who put discovered facts and
knowledge available by his time in one big picture. In attempts to explain the
history Darwin created the most outstanding achievement of human beings that
had enormous impact of our thinking—evolutionary thinking. Ernest Mayer, in
his book “One Long Argument” says following about impact of Darwin’s work on
human thinking.
“It is almost impossible for a modern person to
project back to the early half of the nineteenth century and reconstruct the
thinking of this pre-Darwinian period, so great has been the impact of
Darwinism on our views (E. Mayr, pp. 1)
For our further discussion, one should explicitly
distinguish between evolution and evolutionary theory. Evolution (history) is
a serious of facts that occurred since the birth of the earth, while
evolutionary theory is the best way available nowadays to explain why evolution
happened the way it happened, but not otherwise. Both evolution and
evolutionary theory make series of claims. Some of them are secondary and some
are primary. Primary claims if proved wrong, would change entire theory.
Primary Claims of Evolution
The earth is over 4 billion years old. In the past
when technology was not very developed it was hard to prove age of the earth.
Scientists had been aging by measuring the rate of sedimentation. Another
method of defining age, which was used in 1800s, is noticing what kinds of
fossil rocks have. Currently it is done by chemical analysis of composition of
fossil.
“Some elements such as uranium, undergo radioactive
decay to produce to produce other elements. By measuring the quantities of
radioactive elements and elements into which they decay in rocks, geologists
can determine how much time has elapsed since the rock cooled from initially
molten state (Teaching About Evolution and the Nature of Science).”
Life on the
earth did not appear right after appearance of the earth. The first sings of
life were dated about 550 million years ago according to the oldest fossils.
This fact does not specifically mean that where was not life forms before that
time. Life forms were very simple and lacked hard parts like bones or shells
and could rarely preserve in the fossils.
“However, a few
pre-Cambrian organisms left traces of their existence. Some ancient rocks
contain stromatolities—the remnants of bacteria that grew in columns like
stacked pancakes (Teaching About Evolution, ch. 3, pp. 2)
Extinction is a major feature of biological
evolution. It is in a tight connection with natural selection. Natural
selection works only by means of surviving of changes, in some sense useful,
and therefore, striking root. In the consequence, fast increase of the numbers
of all organic matters in geometrical progression, every natural habitat already
filed to the limits by its habitants. From this it follows those more adapted
forms will increase in numbers and less adapted, will decrease in numbers and
become rare. Rarity of the form is a predecessor of the extinction. Every
form represented by small numbers of individuals has big chances for a complete
extinction in consequence of significant climatic swings within a year or in
consequence of temporary increase of enemies. Species, most abundant of
individuals, have the biggest chances for appearance at any particular time of
favorable changes. Rare individuals will at any particular time change and
perfect at a slower pace and in consequence of that will be defeated in a life
struggle with changed and improved descendants of more common individuals.
From this it follows that since with a passage of time natural selection
“creates” new species, than other species become more rare, and finally
extinct.
For example, during laying eggs season, sea turtles
hay hundreds of thousands eggs. While hatching and getting to the ocean most
of the generation becomes easy pray of sea birds. Since just hatched turtles
do not have a hard cover that could protect them, many of them dye in the
ocean. By maturity time only about one out of thousand turtles stay alive.
Currently there are billions of living organisms that inhabit the earth, but
they represent only around one percent of all living organisms that have ever
lived on the earth since its birth. Ninety nine percent dyed out.[1]
Another
example that mechanisms of evolutionary change are observable and verifiable is
the one described by Henry Walter Bates.
“In 1862, Henry Walter Bates made brilliant use of the Darwinian mechanism of
natural selection asking why it is that some species of butterfly very closely
mimic species of butterfly, essentially quite different, Bates proved beyond
doubt that the answer lies in adaptive advantage brought about by natural
selection. The mimicked insects are highly distasteful to birds who think that
they belong to distasteful species. Bates showed experimentally that birds
learn to avoid distasteful insects, and that the closer the mimic, the less
change there is that the insect will be eaten.”
Secondary Claims of Evolution
When the
earth appeared for the first time it was very different from its current
conditions. The surface of the earth was represented by bare bedrock. At the
time of its birth, the earth represented cold matter, close by its composition
to meteorites. Material it was mad of, contained radioactive elements. In
consequence of the heat excretion while radioactive decomposition of the core
and gravitational compression. However, because of continuous loss of heat
through he surface and lack of radiation heat complete melting of the earth did
not happen. In result of earth’s melting, water and different gases were
brought up to the surface. This water began formation of hydrosphere.
Location
of continents and oceans were very different. According to Wegener’s
hypothesize, which he later supported by evidence, earth’s continents used to
be a single land, which was called Pangea. About two hundred million years
ago Africa and South America slowly began their movement toward their current
location. Wegener supported his hypothesize by geological and biological
evidence. At the place where the continents were aligned, were found
fossilized animals and plants dated more than two hundred million years old.
Besides, if Africa and South America had always been separate continents as they
are now, both of them would have had very different flora and fauna, which are
not.
Starting
at 1950 up to 1970 evidence begin exposing to the world that support hypothesis
of continent’s slow movement. Sonar mapping of the ocean floor showed winding,
continuous ridges system around the planet. The ridges appeared where molten
matter was coming up from the earth’s inside.
Not only topography of the earth has changed, but
composition atmosphere has changed as well. Current atmosphere contains a lot
of oxygen, which is result of existence of life. During photosynthesis, green
plants consume water and dioxide and release oxygen in atmosphere. This is
considered to be a secondary claim because even if the earth would not
developed as it considered, it would have no impact on evolutionary theory.
Origin of human being was an interest of human more
than origin of plant and animals. Attempt to understand and explain origin of
humans is expressed in religions, legends of all kind of trails and folks. For
a long period of time science knowledge were abrupt and incomplete in order to
solve a problem of human origin. Only in 1857 Darwin expressed hypothesis, and
in 1871 in his book “The Origin of man and relation to sex,” convincelly proved
that humans originate from pre-existing humanlike, but were not created by
intelligent designer. Role of social factors, which was pointed out by Darwin,
was detailly described by Fredrik Engels in his book “Role of labor in the
process of turning ape into humans.” (1896)
Human and vertebrates commonness is strongly supported
by similar arrangement of internal organs: skeleton, nerve system, blood
system, respiration, and digestion.
Rudiments and atavisms are very important evidences of
human relatedness to animals. There are about 90 rudiments in human body:
coccyx bone (remaining of the reduced tail); folds in the corner of the eyes
(remaining of the blinking tympanum; thin body hair (remaining of the hair).
All these rudiments are inherited from an animal ancestor. An external tail,
which sometimes people are born with, is related to atavisms. Another atavism
is abandon hair on the face and body.
Common details of the body arrangement are evidence of
close relativeness of human and anthropoids: wrist with flat nails, shape of
eyes and years, the same number of canine and molar teeth, complete change of
baby teeth, and so forth. Physiological commonness is very important: the
same blood groups, diseases (tuberculosis, fly, smallpox, cholera, AIDS,
pneumonia) and parasites (louse). Besides numerous common features, there is a
number of explicit differences evidencing that its current stage, human is
considered to be different species. Only human has ability of upright walking
and related to that peculiarity of structure of the S-shaped backbone with
explicit neck and lumber bend, low extended pelvis, and etc. Human skull is
higher and more rounded without superciliary arch; brain part of skull is in
most part dominated by facial; high forehead, weak jaws with small canine.
Human brain is about two and half times bigger than one of humanlike apes, and
3-4 times heavier.
Human being evolved from other pre-existing species.
Even in ancient times it has been noticed that humans have a lot of in common
with a other animals just like other animals human had the same internal organs
(heart, lungs, liver etc.). Ancient Greeks had a scale of living organisms
known by their time. Human being was placed at the end of the scale. Below
were higher animals like houses, sheep and so forth, but it is hard to believe
that humans were next step in the biological evolution of living organisms
right after higher animals. Only by the eighteenth century ape-like being
became known to Europe. This discover shed light on a huge gap between higher
animal and humans (Darwinism defended, Ruse, pp. 230). After that some
scientists (for example Huxley) assumed that humans descended from apes.
Later, having examined all differences between apes and humans, Huxley came to
conclusion that humans and apes descended from a common ancestor. One would
probably ask why our common ancestor did split into two branches, apes and
Australopithecus afarensis (which is considered to be an ancestor of all
hominids). There is a scientific explanation, which relates to climatic
changes in Africa. Our ancestor was used to live in the area of heavy
precipitation. With a passage of time climate started turning into dry one and
forestlands began retreating, leaving behind Savannah’s. Some species stayed
in dwindling forests. Others (our ancestors) started advancing toward opened
spaces.
With a change of place of
inhabitation, there were some changes in diet of our ancestor. Anthropologists
suggested that tooth reduction took place because our ancestor started to use
grass seeds and the like as a food source (Darwinism Defended).
Major Claims of Evolutionary Theory
Natural selection is the major moving factor of the
evolution of the living organisms. Almost at the same time, several English
naturalists arrived at the idea of existence of natural selection (P. Mathew
(1831), A. Blight (1935), A. Wallace (1858), C. Darwin (1858)), but only Darwin
succeeded in exposing of the meaning of this phenomenon as the major factor of
evolution and created the theory of natural selection. On the contrary, to
artificial selection held by humans, natural selection is conditioned by
influence of surrounding environment upon the organisms. According to Darwin
natural selection is survival of the most accommodated organisms, in
consequence of which, on the basis of undefined inherited changeableness in the
series of generations evolution occurs.
In process of natural selection species more
accommodated to surrounding environment survive, those who do are not, go
extinct. Explicit example of that is our ancestors that had advantage of
standing upright to look out and look for possible object of prey. Natural
selection does not specifically have to lead to perfection. It leads only to
surviving of species that can survive. If entire kind of particular animals
can not survive in changed environment, entire kind will dye out.
“Organisms in nature topically produce more
offspring that can survive and reproduce given the constraints of food, space,
and other resources in the environment. These offspring often differ from one
another in ways that are heritable—that is, they can pass on the differences
genetically to their own offspring. If competing offspring have traits that are
advantageous in a given environment, they will survive and pass on those
traits. As differences continue to accumulate over generations, populations of
organisms diverge from their ancestors.”
Process of natural selection consists of two steps:
the first one is reproduction of genetically different species; the second step
is surviving of the most adopted individuals in surrounding environment. An
example can be nest of birds in which some nestlings have a little bit
different coloring than others. If this coloring better matches the tree these
birds in habit, this will give them advantage of better hiding from predators,
which leads to increase in changes of reproduction. Below are example that
Wallace, Alfred Russle uses in his book “Contributions to the theory of Natural
Selection” to demonstrate natural selection.
“The Duke of Argyll, in his “Reigh of Law,” has
pointed out the admirable adaptation of the colors of the woodcock to its
protection. The various browns and yellows and pale ash-color that occur in
fallen leaves are all reproduced in its plumage, so that when according to its
habit it rests upon the ground under trees, it is almost impossible to detect
it. In snipes the colors are modified so as to be equally in harmony with the
prevalent forms and colors of marshy vegetation. Mr. J.M.Lester, in a paper
read before the Rugby School Natural History Society, observes: --“The
wood-dove, when perched amongst the branches of its favorite fir, is scarcely
discernible; whereas, were it among some lighter foliage, the blue and purple
tints in its plumage would far sooner betray it. The robin redbreast too,
although it might be thought that on its breast made it much easier to be seen,
is in reality not at all endangered by it, since it generally contributes to
get among some russet or yellow fading leaves, where the red matches very well
with the autumn tints, and the brown of the rest of the body with the bare
branches.”
Core of natural selection is variation within the
kind. If variation does not exist either entire kind will survive and stay
unchanged or it will go extinct. But what it a source of variation? The
ultimate source of variation is mutations in genes. If new traits gained
through mutation leads to successful survival and reproduction than new traits
will be inherited and spread within the population. Mutation is random, but
natural selection is not.
All
living organisms that currently inhabit the earth share common ancestry.
Through the history by means of natural selection and variation first, simple
forms of life were evolving into different, more complex forms. How to prove
it?
“The discovery of the structure of DNA by Francis
Crick and James Watson in 1953 extended the study of evolution to most
fundamental level the sequence of the chemical basis in DNA both specifies the
order of amino acids in proteins and determines which proteins are source of
both change and continuity in evolution. The modification of DNA through
occasional changes or rearrangements in the base sequences underlies the
emergence of new traits, and thus of new species, in evolution. At the same
time, all organisms use the same molecular codes to translate DNA base
sequences into Protein amino acid sequences. This uniformity in genetic code
is power evidence for the interrelatedness of living things.” (Teaching About
Evolution and the Nature of Science, ch. 2, pp. 4)
Another
powerful argument that supports common ancestry is a fact that man is developed
from an ovule, about the 125th of an inch in diameter, which does
not differ from the ovules of other animals. At a very early period, the
embryo can hardly be distinguished from another member of vertebrate kind.
In order to convince one that evolution happened the
way evolutionary theory describes it evidences must be presented. Major
evidence and argument of evolutionary theory is that all of the mechanisms of
evolutionary theory change are currently observable. Let us take for example
main mechanism of evolutionary change—natural selection. Nowadays our society
is facing serious public health problem. Bacteria that medicine used to
successfully fight with antibiotics is becoming more resistant to one. This
means that week bacteria go extinct and only strong (more resistant to antibiotics)
bacteria survived. (Teaching about evolution, ch. 2, pp. 5) “continued use and
overuse of antibiotics has had the effect of selecting for resistant population
because the antibiotics give these strains and advantage over non-resistant
strains”
Bibliography
1)
“Long Argument,” Ernest Mayr,
Harvard University Press, 1991.
2)
“Darwinism defended,” Michael
Ruse, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1982.
3)
“The Descent of Man and Selection
in Relation to Sex,” Charles Darwin, 1974.
4)
“Wonderful Life,” Stephen Jay
Gould, W.W. Norton & Company, 1989.
5)
“Contributions to the theory of
natural selection,” Wallace, Alfred Russel, AMS Press, 1973.
[1]
Teaching about Evolution
|